dickie10.WAD, issue 1, by Richard Wiles
Dickie10.wad
https://dsdarchive.com/wads/dickie10

MAP10
Category: UV Max
Exe: DSDA-Doom 0.28.2 -complevel 2
Date: 21.05.2026
Player: vdgg
____________________________
|                          |
| Kills:   158/158   100 % |
|                          |
| Items:    11/19     57 % |
|                          |
| Secrets:   0/0           |
|__________________________|
|                          |
| Time:    < 9:53 >        |
|__________________________|

______________________________________________________________________
|                                                                    |
| Let's talk about positives. The map is very pretty, especially     |
| the "flaming barrel" area. Good job with placement of two          |
| arachnotrons, two mancubuses and one baron in the reactor area -   |
| each at different height, I like how threatening they are despite  |
| such a low number (five monsters).                                 |
|                                                                    |
| ...but honestly, this is a rare example of a map which I find      |
| hard but not very enjoyable. There is that moronic hard-to-reach   |
| arch-vile in the aforementioned flaming barrel area, there is      |
| no armor except the one at the start which means that you can fail |
| your run even if you dodge cyber rockets well, splash damage will  |
| kill you. First exit under 10 min and I honestly don't care.       |
|                                                                    |
| 5:23 I mess up with that door losing time.                         |
| 6:58 The plan was to kill two pain elementals and two cacos first  |
|      but I accidently stepped onto the teleporter. The ending is   |
|      half-improvised and very slow. I had BFG but the drawback     |
|      was too many lost souls which, if kept alive, would have      |
|      surely charged at me in the worst possible moment during icon |
|      of sin shooting.                                              |
|                                                                    |
| My second best was 10:05 which looks nicer overall.                |
|____________________________________________________________________|